Confronting Religion About Terrorism And Other Injustices

Isn’t it just appalling how the media is surfeit with heinous acts of terror and other injustices which have undeniable religious overtones?

Examples include the ISIS/Boko Haram agenda which is often said to find its justification in Islam scriptures, the recent gun attack on Planned Parenthood by a man who clearly has some Christian affiliation and the Happy To Bleed Movement of Indian women who are expressing their grievances about how Hinduist beliefs have somewhat been inteprated against feminism- or at least against a fair understanding of menstruation as perfectly natural and devoid of any spiritual or physical uncleanliness.


In trying to tune the tone between political correctness and fair assessment, these roots of injustices (presumably laced and propped by religious undertones) often go unaddressed for fear of stepping onto people’s toes.

The fact is that it is religious ideas, be it an understanding or misunderstanding of them, that often times incubate some terroristic or injustice acts that are getting more frequent and more commonplace in societies all across the world. In our misconception of political correctness and religious tolerance, our approach barely addresses anything and could be the reason why terrorism and injustice fester.

In aggregate, this is the equivalence of spraying insecticide to unblock the light at night. This may suffice as an immediate solution but if the hive is not identified and dealt with, more insects will block your light from time to time.


I would like to suggest that religious views be placed under a microscope and religious discussions be encouraged to thwart off any misunderstanding or inherent errors in judgment in the religions of the world.

Here’s is my opinion about what good religion comprises:

1. Moral Relevance.


There are some moral imperatives that generally everyone around the world can agree upon. Every human yearns for love, hope, tolerance, justice, respect of property, respect of life etc.

Even the worst of us are receptive to these aspects and that explains so much about human behavior, the nature of happiness and wellbeing among other things. It is when these moral imperatives are fulfilled that a person feels the happiest. This confirms a common denominator in the human psychology.

Partly because of this, a good religion should advocate for these imperatives.

Any beliefs that thwarts any of these aspects should be labeled as a social disorder hence criticised and criminalized.

2. Logical Consistency


A religion inherently assumes, by definition, privilege to decide upon its own doctrine or set of beliefs and partly because of this, ancient scriptures are held as infallible and sacred. However, it is getting more apparent how some  unjust beliefs are smuggled into society through this window.

In light of this, religious leaders should be able to justify the logical basis of religious doctrine -a set of beliefs- and explain why a certain belief system is the best plan to lead society in liberty and progress. Religious people should also demand clarification on some curious issues and should feel free to challenge some religious ideas where necessary.

Moreover, it is no secret how religions of the world are superficially similar at best, but fundamentally different, and thus to suggest that abusive or unjust ideas may persist in some of the contradictions is quite reasonable and a cause for concern.

3. Freedom, Liberty and Tolerance


Some religions have been strongly intrinsic to some societies around the world and this has made religion somewhat sacred, in a similar sense to Race or Gender. This has culminated in what I call Zombie Perception about a belief system by which the intellect of an individual is totally detached from his belief system. This inherently thwarts freedom of religion and leads to intolerance in society since there will be no emphasis on how religious beliefs simply started off as guidelines that solidified into fast rules with time.

Furthermore, a good religion has to acknowledge the free will of someone to opt out, opt in or chose a different religion based on intellectual appeal, informed consideration etc. After all, a religion is defined partly as an attempt to find answers to existential questions ( about Purpose, possible existence of God, Joy, Suffering etc).

We happen to have so many possible truths in the market place of ideas and in acknowledging this, there should be respect and advocacy of religious descretion. Constructive criticism on religious enquiries should be welcomed in good religion so that people can make informed choices.

It is amazing how far we have come as humans; the civilization and the potential of even more. It’d break my heart to see all this being thwarted, ironically, by something which hinges much of its weight on claims of unity and wellbeing of people and of bridging the emotional to the intellectual.

Any belief system that leads to confusion, murder, injustice, hatred etc. is simply a social disorder. I challenge you to evaluate what you believe. If you’re a Truth Seeker, you’ll understand the necessity for this but if you’re just zombie following a belief system blindly then there is a possibility that you’re incubating the eggs of contention in the world- the eggs that gave the terrorist mindset.

P.S: Thanks so much Mary for helping me proofread and brush off some kinks from this. Bless you!

14 thoughts on “Confronting Religion About Terrorism And Other Injustices

  1. You are right. Christianity embraces the freedom to choose or reject and critique as essential components for the ability to become a believer. Isoam simoly means “Submit “, and is an outright command with the threats to follow for refusal.
    One religion will bind you, the other resonates, defines, and inspires freedom.

    One rules by fear, the other by faith and love. 

    These representations are based on the central tenets of the religions compared here and not the misrepresentations of said core beliefs. In short, it is when Christianity is misrepresented that it looks most like the true Islam. The confusion comes when we mistake the natural tendancy for evil in human nature with religion in general. Islam is specifically designed to appeal to the darkness in men’s hearts.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thank you for your comment. I find it quite thoughtful. I’m a Christian myself but I understand it wasn’t that apparent in the post. I just employed a disinterested approach in writing this article.

      I’ve noted your clarification about the differences in Islam and Christianity and generally it is a reasonable claim.

      What do you say about about Homosexuality and Abortion? I know it’s hard on the throat considering Christian beliefs but I’m sure you know that there is a controversy about how exactly a Christian should go about it. That’s one aspect in which Christians have somewhat displayed some behavior which easily passes for antisocial.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Sorry for late reply friend.

        What is the stand of Christianity on Homosexuality and abortion? How does this translate to a society with so many different ideas and opinions on lifestyle?


  2. they say, “All religions have got some hate speech in them and hope too.” Islam is described as a religion of peace so are the other religions. If we were to base our reasoning on logic, freedom and moral then its better to be an earthiest. We should live knowing we have been served by grace.

    As long as people will be searching for God there will be Terrorism attacks coz they will always try to fill that emptiness withing them. Each and every religion promises you the supernatural so people will still find a reason to believe in what they believe in.

    We can talk about this for a long time but we just need to realize that we are living in the last days. Wake up child of God. #JesusIs4EveryOne.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thank you King. I’ll chew on what you have said.

      I have questions though: Are you saying that Truth is not verifiable? And if so, where does that leave us when everybody decides to follow his own beliefs? Aren’t injustices are often incubated by this acceptance of a belief system in blond faith? Can people be religious and think at the same time?

      Don’t you think that in an environment where discussions are advocated, people would have better chances at arriving at answers?


    1. You’re right. Those are valid questions but I have heard Muslim apologists attempt to set straight curious suras such as these. Mind you, there are some Muslim leaders that condemned the attack on France.

      Just to be fair, here’s 1Corinthians 14vs34:
      “The women should be silent in the churches, for they are not permitted to speak, but should be submissive, as the law also says.”

      I’m sure you see how this can be interpreted to be somewhat antisocial.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s